Quantcast
Channel: Startups
Viewing all 5208 articles
Browse latest View live

The 'Airbnb for cars' is launching in the UK — but there's a catch

$
0
0

turo daniel bmw

LONDON — Turo, an American startup that lets you rent your car to strangers, is launching in the UK.

But there's just one catch: You can't actually use it to rent out your car.

To begin with, individual car owners won't be able to use it to list their vehicles, with the focus instead on small car rental businesses looking for an online platform to list their vehicles on.

It's an interesting move — and highlights that despite the buzz around the "sharing economy," some of the most successful startups in the space end up looking a lot like the traditional businesses they are trying to disrupt.

Turo? Think 'Airbnb for cars'

The company originally launched in 2009 under the name "RelayRides,"rebranding as Turo in November 2015 as it raised a $47 million (£38 million) series C funding round from Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers (previous investors include Google Ventures, now known as GV).

It's been referred to as the "Airbnb for cars"— it lets you rent out your vehicle when you're not using it to strangers for a few days at a time, and taking a cut of the proceeds. Available in its home market the US as well as Canada, it claims to have 2 million registered users, and 110,000 vehicles listed on the platform from more than 4,500 cities.

It markets itself heavily on its uniqueness — showing photos of "Winston's" BMW 4 Series, "Osama's" Porsche Cayman, or "Elrich's" Ford Escape Aviato on its homepage. With the focus on these individual, non-professional car owners looking to make a bit of extra cash, it couldn't be more different from traditional car rental services.

turo

But since its launch, the company has undergone an interesting evolution: Increasingly, the platform is used by "power users"— people who, rather than rent out their personal vehicle when they're not using it, have a dedicated fleet of cars that are owned only to be rented out on Turo. Traditional car rental services, in other words.

Most Turo car owners (the company calls them "hosts") are still ordinary users — just 15% of hosts are "power users," CEO Andre Haddad told Business Insider.

CEO Andre Haddad of TuroBut nearly 60% of the company's revenues come from that 15% of professional power hosts.

"We've expanded from the individual owner which was just the very start of the company to the entrepreneur enthusiast," Haddad said.

Some of these power users actually started out as regular hosts, before realising the opportunities of the platform and building a fleet of cars, becoming a "car rental enthusiast ... inspired by the potential of Turo." Others are "existing 'mom and dad' type car rental operations."

In the UK, only these professional operations will be able to rent out vehicles on the platform to customers, although Haddad says the plan is to open it up to non-professional hosts halfway through 2017.

Traditional businesses are getting in on the 'sharing economy'

The "sharing economy" promises to use tech to connect ordinary people with something to spare to others looking to use it on a temporary basis.

But Turo's success highlights another side to it: How companies in the space are often finding success by arbitraging professional businesses and customers instead.

Airbnb is perhaps the most obvious example of this. Its appeal (and $30 billion (£24 billion) valuation) is based on rejecting traditional, sterile hotels in favour of authentic local apartments and rentals. "Don't go there,"says the company. "Live there."

But around the world, professional landlords with multiple properties have also hopped on the platform, using it to rent out properties year-round. One study estimated that in 12 major metropolitan areas, guests spent $1.3 billion (£1 billion) in around a year, with $500 million (£402 million) generated by landlords with multiple properties, Bloomberg reported in January 2016.

Another example is Zaarly, a startup backed by Kleiner Perkins and Ashton Kutcher. On Zaarly, users didn't share spare goods but spare time: You could list odd-jobs you needed doing on the platform, and your neighbours could agree to do them for a fee. It raised $14 million (£11 million) in 2011, but ultimately pivoted in 2013 into a more traditional storefront for home services, from pest control to cleaning. (It continues to operate in this current iteration today.)

None of this is a criticism of Turo, of course. Andre Haddad is open about the platform's power user base, and emphasises the company's interest in smaller operations that offer customers "diversity." Around 25% of the UK rental market is non-franchisees, that "tend to have between 10 and 50 cars" with "unique service offerings, unique cars."

"We're not interested in the franchisees of Hertz and others," he says.

Turo: In some ways innovative, in some ways orthodox

turo car sharingTuro currently employees around 200 people, with an office recently opened in London to accompany the launch. Andre Haddad declined to disclosed revenues, and said the company isn't yet profitable, focusing on investment for the future instead. The company is already thinking about future expansion, with elsewhere in Western and Eastern Europe, Australia, and Brazil all areas of interest.

It's a hybrid model — the innovative alongside the orthodox, the "sharing economy" alongside a much more familiar marketplace. And its success illustrates how that the tech industry's bold promises of disruption often end up morphing into something rather more conventional.

"I don't see these two as contradictory to one another," Haddad says of the platform's dual use by ordinary users and professional power hosts. "It doesn't make us less interested in bringing individual hosts because we know that by bringing those individual hosts in the first place, we will see ... power hosts emerging ... I'm feeling good about the balance between the two," he said.

"The vast majority of our hosts remain individual hosts ... and they provide a lot of that diversity in the market place."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why pizzas come with that plastic table in the center


The cofounder of Yo! and $16,000 smartphone company Sirin has a new startup baby

$
0
0

Moshe Hogeg Sirin

Moshe Hogeg, a serial entrepreneur from Israel with multiple businesses to his name, has found a new startup to back with his millions called Dragonera.

Dragonera has developed a service that can supposedly automate up to 70% of the early development of new products and platforms. It does this by providing pre-packaged bits of code that companies can lift and put into their apps and websites.

It does this by providing pre-packaged bits of code that companies can lift and put into their apps and websites.

These bits of code can be put together, much like the pieces of puzzle, to form a complete final software product, Dragonera claims.

"Over the course of ten years in the startup scene, I’ve witnessed many great ideas fail to thrive because there were no affordable alternatives to software development in-house, to allow a short time to market. Being able to take minimalistic approach and model redundant product decisions and implementation allows us to do just that," said Ido Sadeh Man, founder and CEO of Dragonera, in a statement.

Dragonera"Successful growing organisations are inevitably similar to walking in the mud. No matter how in shape you are, you become heavier with every step. Our platform allows a single executive to outsource product building, whether it’s an internal tool, a blockchain proof of concept, a promotional game etc., while maintaining full control over the outcome."

Dragonera, which is based in Tel Aviv, is said to be one of Hogeg's "most recent babies and a project he is super involved with", according to his spokeswoman.

Hogeg has backed the company with $3 million (£2.4 million) in venture capital funding through his Singulariteam investment company.

Hogeg, who used to lead a team of 150 soldiers in an "elite unit" for the Israeli Defence Forces, is also the cofounder of a mobile phone company called Sirin, which has developed a $16,000 smartphone called Solarin. He's also the cofounder of the Yo! app and social media company Mobli.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 places you can’t find on Google Maps

The 38 most valuable enterprise startups of 2016

$
0
0

thumbs up happy worker man content good nice job employee boss

2016 was an odd year when it came to venture funding.

While there was still plenty of money available, investors weren't as generous with their terms as they were during their check-writing frenzy of 2014-2015. They wanted to nab a bigger piece of equity for the money they put in.  

So, if the previous period was all about "unicorns"– startups that raised so much money at such great terms that their investors valued them at over $1 billion 2016 was the year of the "down round." That's when cash-burning startups had to sell shares for a lower price than they previously commanded.

Given this backdrop, we thought it would be interesting to look at the enterprise startups that did the best nabbing money in 2016 and growing their valuations this year. Enterprise startups are those that sell their products and services to other businesses, as opposed to consumers. 

We asked PitchBook, a company that offers a database of venture and private equity funding, to sift through its vast collection of financial records to come up with this list of the highest-valued enterprise startups of 2016, based exclusively on startups that completed financing rounds in 2016.

n

SEE ALSO: 38 enterprise startups that will boom in 2017, according to VC investors

Yieldbot: $95.79 million for online ads

Company:Yieldbot

Date of last round: 8/3/2016

Amount: $35 million

Total funding to date: $65.37 million

Post-money valuation: $95.79 million

Provides a rules-based online advertising service. The company collects visitor data, mines it and then serves advertisements to the visitor.



Skycatch: $96 million for photo drones

Company:Skycatch

Date of last round: 9/19/2016

Amount: $26 million

Total funding to date: $46.01 million

Post-money valuation: $96 million

Provides small flying drones designed to take pictures and video for commercial needs, like logistics. 



Invoca: $100 million for marketing software

Company:Invoca

Date of last round: 3/30/2016

Amount: $29.5 million

Total funding to date: $61.93 million

Post-money valuation: $100 million

Provides a cloud app to help marketers understand why customers are calling, who's calling, and analyze what's being said in conversations.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Two top executives just left secretive startup Faraday Future before its big car reveal

$
0
0

Faraday Future

Faraday Future, the troubled electric car startup, was just dealt another blow.

Two top executives have left the company before the startup's big car reveal at the Consumer Electronics Show in early January, The Verge first reported.

Joerg Sommer, vice president of product marketing and growth, and Marco Mattiacci, global chief brand and commercial officer, are no longer listed on the Faraday Future website as executives.

Sommer noted he is no longer working at Faraday Future and is seeking opportunities elsewhere on his LinkedIn page.

Faraday Future did not immediately return Business Insider's request for comment.

A source told The Verge that Sommer's and Mattiacci's departures could be seen as a way to free up funds for the company as both were highly compensated.

Indepdently, a former employee who wished to remain anonymous told Business Insider that Mattiacci had told Jia Yueting, the CEO of LeEco and personal investor in Faraday Future, that he did not feel comfortable showing a car at the Consumer Electronics Show because it is not ready.

Mattiacci did not immediately return Business Insider's request for comment.

Faraday Future recently settled a lawsuit with its seat supplier Futuris that was filed after Faraday Future allegedly fell behind on $10 million worth of payments. That means Faraday Future needs to find a new seat supplier, which could take up to two years, The Verge reported Thursday.

In early November, Yueting told LeEco staff that the company was facing a shortage of cash from expanding too fast and in too many directions.

Faraday Future has also stopped work on its $1 billion factory in North Las Vegas, and is likely to miss the shipping deadline for its production vehicles that were said to come to market some time in 2017.

It's also facing another lawsuit from Beim Maple Properties, which alleges Faraday Future is behind on roughly $105,000 in rent payments for a warehouse, Buzzfeed News reported.

Faraday Future also does not own the intellectual property for its technology. A separate entity, FF Cayman Global, owns the intellectual property, which could prevent suppliers from filing a claim against assets in the event of bankruptcy.

SEE ALSO: Faraday Future doesn't own its intellectual property — and that could spell trouble down the line

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Everything we know about the Tesla Model 3

33 startups to watch in 2017, according to VC investors

$
0
0

Laurel & Wolf

2017 is almost here and it's once again time to predict which startups will take the tech industry by storm.

Who better to ask than the startup experts, the VCs that watch the industry, guide the startups, hear their pitches, and invest in them?

So we reached out to a handful of top VCs and asked them which young or growth-stage startups will boom in 2017.

We asked them to particularly focus on non-enterprise startups — companies that sell directly to consumers rather than businesses. (For the hottest companies in enterprise, check out our list here).

The VCs we spoke to gave us this list that includes everything from video chat apps, to delivery drones, to companies that help you track your spending or invest your money.

Below are the 33 companies that are poised to boom in 2017.

NOW CHECK OUT: 38 enterprise startups that will boom in 2017, according to VC investors

Hooked: bite-sized stories for your phone

Company name: Hooked

VC: Greylock's Josh Elman

Relationship: VC is an investor.

Funding: $3 million

What it does: Hooked turns stories into bite-sized, chat-style messages, or lets fans write their own.

Why it's hot:"Hooked makes it easier for readers to consume the story in small bites, say when they’re waiting in line or riding the subway. The company is now working with Hollywood producers to help identify new writing talent and promising intellectual property. In fact, Hooked has a number of new investors from the movie and TV world, including Warner Bros. President Greg Silverman," Elman says.



Robinhood: Free stock trading

Company name: Robinhood

VC: Greylock's Josh Elman

Relationship:None. VC just thinks it's cool and buys and sells some public stocks there.

Funding: $66 million

What it does: Robinhood is a free stock-trading app that makes it easy to buy and sell stocks from your phone.

Why it's hot:"The app makes stock trading free, intuitive, and mobile. Robinhood allows people to get into trading, and make decisions to buy or sell stock in companies without the burden of expensive fees. It has a chance to revolutionize stock ownership for millennials," Elman says.



Laurel & Wolf: interior designing online

Company name: Laurel & Wolf

VC: Charles River Ventures' Saar Gur

Relationship: VC is an investor.

Funding: $25 million

What it does: Laurel & Wolf easily connects people with interior designers online, making it easy and affordable to transform a space.

Why it's hot:"Laurel & Wolf will be hot as their service becomes more mainstream. Early customers LOVE the service," Gur says.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Rent The Runway, the 'Netflix for dresses,' just raised another $60 million and claimed profitability for the first time

$
0
0

Rent the Runway

The "Netflix for dresses" startup, Rent The Runway, has proven it can make a profit — an achievement rewarded with a $60 million investment from Fidelity meant to accelerate its growth, the company told Recode's Jason Del Rey

According to Recode's report, the company finally achieved profitability on an EBITDA basis on its $100 million revenue run rate this year. It's in large part due to the success of its unlimited subscription service, a $139/month program that lets women rent three items at a time and exchange them as often as they'd like. 

While Rent The Runway had struggled with the launch of its unlimited subscription service, it now accounts for more than 20% of the company's revenue. The company also eliminated performance bonuses and instead incorporated previous bonus potential into each employee’s salary, raising the base salaries for its 1,000 employees.

This newest round of funding at the end of 2016 — a successful year for Rent The Runway — came after a rocky 2015 in which Fortune spoke with former employees and investors to investigate the “exodus” of several top-level executives at the company, who were either fired or left over the span of 10 months. Investors, though, are looking at the bottom line and seem to be pleased with Rent The Runway's financial health. Its CEO, Jenn Hymann, told Recode that its valuation is a "significant step up" from its last round in 2014, which valued the company at $520 million.

SEE ALSO: These 15 startups didn't exist 5 years ago — now they're worth billions

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A Silicon Valley startup is using robots to make pizza

The 27 best startups that launched this year

$
0
0

Daniel Schreiber, Lemonade CEO

Great businesses can be launched any time, even when there's a downturn in funding.

While 2016 might have spelled trouble for some well-established startups, it also saw the birth of companies tackling things like a cure for cancer, life-saving drones, and competition for Uber.

Business Insider spoke to founders and venture capitalists and took a look at funding data to identify some of the startups that had the biggest starts in 2016. Some names on the list are officially launching out of stealth, while others are still in their early months of forming a company.

Here are 27 of the top startups that launched in 2016.

SEE ALSO: 33 startups to watch in 2017, according to VC investors

Grail wants to develop a test for cancer at the earliest possible stage.

What is it: Illumina, the maker of DNA-sequencing technology, teamed up with a group of Silicon Valley investors to develop a blood test for any kind of cancer at an earlier stage than previously possible.

Using Illumina's technology, a new company called Grail will look for a way to measure circulating nucleic acids — bits of DNA that circulate in the blood outside blood cells. While most of our DNA is inside our cells, scientists use CNAs to test for cancer and other diseases noninvasively. Its ambitious mission: Develop a universal cancer-screening test.

Funding: $100 million from investors, including Arch Venture Partners, Bezos Expeditions, Bill Gates, and Sutter Hill Ventures. Illumina remains majority shareholder.

Website:grailbio.com



Allbirds invented an all-wool shoe that has quickly become a cult favorite in tech.

What is it: Called the world's most comfortable shoe by venture capitalists, Allbirds debuted its first pair of all-wool sneakers in March 2016. Allbirds uses merino wool from its founders' home country of New Zealand that's then processed in Milan, Italy. The result is a shoe so incredibly comfortable that Business Insider staffers swear they're like slippers made of clouds.

Funding: $9.95 million from Lerer Hippeau Ventures and Maveron, among others. 

Website:allbirds.com



Lemonade is selling you insurance in a whole new way.

What is it: Lemonade, an insurance startup, launched from stealth in September with its first product: peer-to-peer homeowner's and renter's insurance in New York. Lemonade sells rental insurance policies for as little as $5 a month, and home insurance for as low as $35 a month (your policy rates may vary). Its business is conducted entirely online via an app. There are no human insurance brokers, and no plans to ever use them. But where most insurance companies pocket the money you pay as profits, less any claims paid, Lemonade takes a straight 20% cut of the policy rate as its share. And if your group pays more collectively than it uses as claims for the year, Lemonade donates the money to a charity of your choice (from your kid's school to an established charity).

Funding: $60 million from Sequoia and Aleph.

Website: lemonade.com



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Ava is a wearable fertility-tracking device — and it's coming to Europe

$
0
0

Ava

Tracking fertility isn't easy, but it can be, says Lea von Bidder, cofounder of fertility tracking company Ava.

Ava's £199 (€249, $199) sensor bracelet, worn only at night, tracks changes across nine physiological parameters, like heart rate and temperature, and uses them to monitor the user's menstrual cycle in real time.

The Swiss medical technology company, which last month raised $9.7 million (£8 million) in a Series A funding round, is expanding into Europe in January after launching in the US in July. Most of the money will go into data science and clinical research, the company said.

Unlike period-tracking apps such as Clue, Ava doesn't rely on any data inputted by the user, Bidder told Business Insider, allowing it to be more accurate.

"Inputting your menstruation and from there guessing when your next ovulation is going to be is, in the end, a guessing game ... it only knows the end point, not what your body is doing before menstruation. Especially if you have a very irregular cycle, or a slightly irregular cycle, which most women have," Bidder said.

Instead of relying on user-inputted data, Ava works by tracking nine physiological parameters through the bracelet — such as heat loss, pulse rate, and temperature —and links changes in these parameters to hormonal changes during the menstrual cycle (specifically oestrogen and progesterone). It then syncs this data to the app, notifying the user of their "conception probability."

"This is really crucial," Bidder told Business Insider, because it "helps us detect the very beginning of the fertile window and not just the end as, for example, urine or temperature tests [traditionally used to track fertility] potentially could ... That’s why women who currently use us like us so much because it’s easier and way earlier, so couples have time to prepare, enough time to book a romantic weekend away and to make use of the full fertility window."

Ava

Results from the device's first clinical trial at the University Hospital of Zurich showed that the bracelet detected an average of 5.3 fertile days per cycle with 89% accuracy — in total women have six fertile days and 70% of pregnancies happen within three of them, Bidder said.

And Bidder thinks Ava's bracelet and technology were way overdue: "What we are doing right now should have been around when Fitbit started to become big. We are just trying to catch up with the technology. As a modern woman who is travelling around, working, for her to be forced to start taking her temperature with a thermometer every morning at 6 am is a bad situation."

The FDA-registered company has so far presented at medical conferences on the relationship between changes in temperature and heart rate (two of the nine physiological parameters its bracelet detects) and hormonal changes during the menstrual cycle, Bidder said.

Ava wants to be more than just a fertility tracker

Ava sees itself not just as a fertility tool, but as a women's health company. And its ambitions reflect that.

Ava

Bidder told Business Insider: "We want to accompany women throughout all their different life stages, be it trying to get pregnant, being pregnant, contraception, or menopause ... There’s so many phases in your life where the hormonal changes in your life make a big difference. And all of those areas are the areas we want to get into."

"We’ve actually seen a lot of women in their twenties who are not trying to get pregnant buy the bracelet just because they have a huge urge to start understanding their body better and understand why they feel a certain way at the end of their cycle," she said.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This machine solves the most time-consuming things about doing laundry


NEW UNICORNS: Meet the 14 startups that grew to be worth billions in 2016

$
0
0

a trip to unicorn island

In Silicon Valley, a "unicorn" is a company with a billion-dollar valuation. Its name implies how rare it should be to reach that status.

But as more money pours into startups — a prominent trend over the last few years — more startups are achieving "unicorn" status.

Unicorns hit a fever pitch in 2015, when 42 startups achieved billion-dollar valuations. Yet as the data shows, becoming a unicorn wasn't quite as easy in 2016.

For the purposes of this list, Business Insider asked PitchBook Data to pull a list of US-based companies that reached a $1 billion-plus valuation in 2016. We then ranked them from least to most valuable based on their post-money valuations.

Here are the companies that became unicorns in 2016:

SEE ALSO: 51 enterprise startups to bet your career on in 2017

Compass

Founded: 2012

Valuation: $1 billion

What it does: While Compass functions like a traditional broker, the company's promise is to use technology to reduce the time and friction of buying and selling a house or apartment.

In July, Compass released an app designed to replace "stale" quarterly market reports with more dynamic information. In the app, buyers and sellers can search by things like neighborhood, number of bedrooms, price range, and so on, but they can also look at more advanced metrics, like year-over-year analysis of median price per square foot, days on the market, and negotiability.



SMS Assist

Founded: 2003

Valuation: $1 billion

What it does: The Chicago-based technology company provides software to help property managers supervise things like electrical work, snow-plow contractors, and landscaping. The "no-glamour" company allows property managers to keep tabs on multiple properties at once, and it has already signed on customers like Family Dollar and Colony Starwood Homes.



ForeScout

Founded: 2000

Valuation: $1 billion

What it does: ForeScout's technology helps companies monitor all the devices that are connected to their network at any given time. For many large enterprises, the number of devices can easily run into the millions with things like PCs, employees' mobile devices, virtual machines used for testing new applications, and now internet of things devices — and that can make it it hard for network administrators to keep tabs on everything happening on their company's network.

ForeScout's CEO said that when the company first runs its software with a client, it typically finds 20-30% more devices on the network than the client's IT team expected.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

A founder-turned-venture-capitalist reveals how to not get trampled by a unicorn startup if you're an employee with stock options

$
0
0

early google employees

As a product-obsessed entrepreneur and investor, I rarely focus on financing mechanics in the start-up world. It tends to be a binary outcome, and people should join a venture for the team and mission more than anything else. However, a string of recent conversations with really talented employees (and prospective employees) at later stage start-ups have stayed in my mind…this post is for them.

A company’s fate is ultimately determined by its people, so talent is everything. But this old adage bumps up against another one: cash is king (or runway is king, for a fast-growing private company). Without runway, talent takes off. 😉 So, it is no surprise that bold moves to extend runway (think late-stage financings at technically large valuations with some tricky liquidation preferences underneath) are done even if they could hurt the company (and it’s people) in the long run. This is especially true when these financings are ego-driven rather than strategic. The problem is, the employees at these companies don’t understand the implications. They see the valuation, they know the number of shares they own or are being offered, but they do the wrong math.

The “unicorn” phenomenon (the vast number of companies that have raised over $100M at a $1B+ valuation) gets enough media coverage these days. Much has been written about the founders of these companies, their investors, and their rapidly growing valuations. But very little has been written about the employees, the people that do all the work and whose careers rely upon the judgement of their leaders and investors. How can employees — and prospective employees — protect themselves in this environment?

One of my sad predictions for 2017 is a bunch of big headline-worthy acquisitions and IPOs that leave a lot of hard working employees at these companies in a weird spot. They’ll be congratulated by everyone they know for their extraordinary success while scratching their heads wondering why they barely benefited. Of course, the reason is that these employees never understood their compensation in the first place (and they were not privy to the terms of all the financings before and after they were hired).

I have had a few conversations about compensation at so-called “unicorn” companies the past few months. Two of these conversations were with prospective employees — an engineer and a designer — with offers to join later-stage private companies in mid-level producer-manager roles. Another conversation was with the founder of a very early stage startup contemplating an acquisition offer from one of the later-stage delivery/food-related private companies. And the most recent conversation was with a senior HR professional at one of these $1B+ valued companies. All of these conversations reinforced my concern that employees (and founders of acquihire/acquisition targets) don’t understand how the capital structure of later-stage private companies can impact the true value of their compensation and outcome.

The Quick Primer For How “Unicorn” Employees Get Trampled

horse raceWhen CEO’s need more runway, they naturally seek investment at a higher valuation than their last round. When the company’s performance doesn’t warrant the valuation they seek (or when investors have the upper hand), investors can insert special terms to protect their interests, essentially limiting their downside at the expense of past equity holders, many of whom are employees.

Over coffee the other day with the Head of HR at a late-stage start-up, she confirmed for me how few candidates even ask about their stock grants. “And when they do, they ask for more shares, without even knowing the denominator,” she said in amazement. “And when they know the denominator and the hypothetical value of stock at the last round, they almost never ask about liquidation preferences or other barometers for the likely long-term value.” Wow. To bring this home, it’s like negotiating your salary without specifying the currency you’re being paid in.

While the drive to join a company cannot be solely about the money, I also believe that the possibility of reward must accompany risk. If you’re joining an early start-up, these questions are premature and your focus should be on building something of value. But if you’re joining a later stage private company, its just being responsible.

Don’t Get Trampled By A Unicorn, Audit Your Comp

So, if you’re an employee working at a “unicorn” company (or are considering joining one), what questions should you have? Here’s a bit of a primer for employees:

  1. Have you raised capital with liquidation preferences, and what are they? A liquidation preference specifies which investors get paid first in the event your company is acquired or goes public. It also determines how much investors get paid before everyone else gets paid. It is standard and necessary to have a “1x non-participating liquidation preference” which means that investors will get the amount they invested out first (before employees). The thing to look out for is a higher liquidation preference, where investors get a multiple of their investment out first, before you or any other shareholder gets a single dollar — regardless of how much equity you own. If your company has raised a lot of money with high liquidation preferences, you could argue that your salary and/or grant should be larger to account for the increased risk of your shares being worthless. Like any investment that is less marketable as a result of an illiquid market, stock that is less likely to be valuable and/or marketable should be discounted.
  2. How many months of runway do you have? The amount of money your company has raised, divided by the amount it “burns” every month (expenses beyond revenue), determines the number of months your company can survive before it either makes more, spends less, or needs to raise more funding. If your company is running out of money, your CEO is more likely to raise money at unattractive terms (like a high liquidation preference). If runway is limited, you’re entitled to ask about the plan.
  3. If you need to raise more money but are unable to do so at standard terms, will you accept less favorable terms or will you raise at a lower valuation? I wouldn’t ask this question straight out, but I’d look for the signs. A big consequence of the press’s celebration of billion-dollar valuations is the desire to be one or stay one, despite unfavorable terms. Founders are essentially compromising the long-term value of shares held by employees in exchange for a larger valuation today. In a more normal world, companies would be able to tolerate ups and downs in valuation with the realization that every company goes through cycles (recall not too long ago when Facebook traded below it’s IPO price, Netflix plummeted during its transition away from DVD’s, etc…). The value of your shares can go up or down, but liquidation preferences stick around. The best CEOs can stomach and lead their teams through some volatility rather than optimize for short-term headlines. In his post last year about the mechanics of these late-stage financings, Bill Gurley (with whom I work as a Venture Partner at Benchmark) makes the point that employees need to understand their CEO’s approach, “if your CEO/founder will take a dirty round, and is also anti-IPO, the chance that you will ever see liquidity for your shares anywhere near what you think they are worth is very, very low.”
  4. Has the company taken on debt? Like a liquidation preference, debt must be repaid before the proceeds from being acquired are divided by shareholders. A company with a lot of debt is another red flag that could certainly jeopardize the value of your shares in the event your company is acquired.
  5. Does the company aspire to be a public company? To be clear, a company need not aspire to go public. However, raising hundreds of millions of dollars leaves very few other ways to return value to investors or employees. Nevertheless, there are many CEOs that want to keep their companies private while continuing to raise massive amounts of capital despite unfavorable terms. You deserve to know the intentions of your leaders. Perhaps there is a good reason related to certain milestones your company must reach before going public? Alternatively, it may seem like the allure of less scrutiny is driving decisions (red alert!). The answer you get will help you quantify the likehood of your shares being valuable over time.
  6. If the company’s plan is to stay private for the foreseeable future, have there been secondary sales for employees and/or founders? Its a controversial question — you may want to fish around vs. appear to be so focused on liquidity, but it is fair for you to know whether employees and founders are selling their shares while the company is still private. If there is no line of sight to becoming a public company, secondary sales are your only chance at liquidity. But there are cultural and signaling implications if some employees are able to sell their shares.
  7. Have the company’s financials been audited? Obviously, the value of your shares in the company is connected to the company’s financials. Early stage start-ups without massive expenses or balance sheets need not endure audited financials. But as companies become larger and/or valuable, checks and balances ensure that mistakes or misrepresentations are not impacting how investors value the business (which ultimately determines how many shares you receive in the company). You’d be shocked to learn how many companies raising money at a billion-dollar valuation are doing so with financials that have never been checked/audited by a third-party. Again, if you’re taking a major risk in your career for a grant of stock with a proposed value, you deserve to know how reliable it is.

Don’t Wait For The Cataclysmic Event, Start Asking Now

yext, office tour,Like most bad behavior that brews in any industry, the bad behavior is liable to continue without much attention until a major event blasts it into consciousness.

Imagine waking up one morning to the news that one of the popular “unicorn” companies was just acquired for a billion dollars. “Wow,” you think. Headlines fly around celebrating the outcome. And then suddenly there is a flurry of tweets from employees of the company followed by an expose article revealing the fact that employees actually made very little from the acquisition. How is this possible? The company raised money at increasingly high valuations at unfavorable terms, and there was little left to distribute to common shareholders. Hundreds of employees got nothing more than a hard lesson learned.

I hope it doesn’t take such an event to encourage companies to disclose the mechanics behind their valuation and illustrate the implications for employee shares. But you can start asking now. Your CEO’s willingness to answer these questions, the cleanliness and simplicity of his/her answers, and the assurances your CEO provides you are as important as any quoted value for the shares you are given for your investment of time in the company — an investment far more valuable than money.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here’s why airlines make you put your phone on ‘Airplane Mode’

Twitter cofounder Evan Williams lays off one-third of staff at Medium, closes two offices

$
0
0

Medium CEO Evan Williams

Medium is laying off one-third of its staff — roughly 50 people — as the company changes its course, according to a post from its founder and CEO Evan Williams

The Twitter cofounder announced on Wednesday that the publishing platform will be shuttering two offices in New York and Washington D.C. as part of the down-sizing. The majority of the employees let go are in sales or other business functions, leaving the engineering and product teams largely intact.

The downsizing comes as the company looks to change its business model after it felt that it was "falling short" of its original goals. 

According to Williams' original mission, Medium was supposed to be a "new model for media on the internet." Yet the startup didn't exactly pioneer a new path when in October it announced that it was going to be rolling out native ad campaigns and sponsored posts on the site. 

Medium has now changed its mind about that direction and the startup says it will be looking at a new way to support the internet's writers and creators.

"Upon further reflection, it’s clear that the broken system is ad-driven media on the internet. It simply doesn’t serve people,"Williams wrote. "....So, we are shifting our resources and attention to defining a new model for writers and creators to be rewarded, based on the value they’re creating for people. And toward building a transformational product for curious humans who want to get smarter about the world every day."

What the new model is is unknown, and the company says it will take a long time to find out. Williams say it is "too soon to say exactly what it this will look like". 

SEE ALSO: These tech startups are IPO candidates to watch in 2017

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A UK startup made a robot chef that cooks food for you

Lastminute.com founder Brent Hoberman explains why the UK will find it harder to build Google-sized companies after Brexit

$
0
0

Brent Hoberman

Brent Hoberman, the cofounder of Lastminute.com and a serial entrepreneur, believes that the UK will have even less chance of building technology companies with $10 billion (£8 billion) valuations if it's not part of Europe's digital single market.

The digital single market, which is still in development, is designed to enable businesses in EU member states to sell their products and services to the 500 million digital consumers that live across Europe with relative ease.

Speaking to Business Insider last month on the topic of decacorns, Hoberman said the digital single market will "smooth" a lot of "mega barriers" when it is finished, thereby helping tech startups to scale. The entrepreneur, who runs the Founders Factory incubator and several other businesses, added: "It looks like we're going to be out of it, so then what's the politicians' answer?"

The reason the UK does not already have tech businesses as big as Apple, Google, Amazon, and Facebook in the US, or Alibaba and Huawei in China, is because it doesn't have a big enough home market, according to Hoberman. China has over 1.3 billion people and the US boasts over 300 million, but the UK only has 64 million.

"We've got just enough of a home market to make a good business, but not enough to make a mega business, so you have to go abroad," said Hoberman. "If you're going across pan-Europe, which is the most obvious thing to do, it's really hard, and I don't think anyone gives credit to European entrepreneurs who are pan-European and I say this from somebody who arrogantly thought doing it wasn't really hard when I did lastminute.com."

Even though the UK has voted to leave the European Union, there is still a possibility that it could remain a part of the digital single market.

"I think somebody in the government should stand up and recognise that this digital single market would be one of the most valuable things we could do and I haven't heard them even talk about the digital market," he said. "So I think saying we're missing out on that, is there any regime we could do, to help us get access to that, would be helpful. The question is would it be smart politics? It would be smart business, but is it smart politics?"

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This teen makes up to $1,500 a night eating dinner in front of a webcam in South Korea

The 21 hottest female-founded startups to watch in 2017

$
0
0

emily weiss glossier

There's never been a better time to be a woman in the startup world.

There's no denying we have a long way to go. After all, venture capital firms are made up of mostly men, and some continue to suggest women aren't cut out for the tech world at all. And way more VC money is offered to male founders than women.

But more and more women are building multimillion-dollar startups, and venture firms like Forerunner Ventures, BBG Ventures, and Female Founders Fund all focus on female-founded companies.

It's paying off. 2016 saw female founders launch innovative companies and raise millions to help them grow, while startups in their second or third year of life began gaining ground.

And 2017 is likely to be even bigger. Here are some of the most exciting women-run companies to keep an eye on in the coming year. 

SEE ALSO: THE $10 BILLION CLUB: Meet the 8 most valuable startups in the US

Parachute wants to make a comfy night's sleep affordable.

What is it: Parachute is changing how you buy one thing you use every day: your sheets. It produces the high-quality bedding from a factory in Italy and then sells it only through its website, and one store at its headquarters in Venice Beach, California. Parachute bedding has gained a bit of a cult following, and now co-living startups are even advertising that they have Parachute sheets with Casper mattresses. Every time a customer buys a set of its Venice line the company donates a mosquito net to help kids in Africa have a safe sleep.

Founded: 2014 by Ariel Kaye

Funding: $10.28 million from Upfront Ventures, Joanne Wilson, QueensBridge Venture Partners, and Structure Partners, among others.



Laurel & Wolf connects interior designers with people who want to give their homes an affordable makeover.

What is it: Laurel & Wolf wants to take advantage of a Pinterest-obsessed generation and make it easy and affordable to design your dream home. People searching for a new look can take a survey about their style, upload pictures and information about the space, and post their project. Typically, three to five designers respond with their ideas so you don't have to settle on one from the start.

Founded: 2014 by Leura Fine and Brandon Kleinman

Funding: $26.63 from Benchmark, Charles River Ventures, Tim Draper, and others.



Maven lets you video chat with doctors.

What is it: Maven is a women's health app that connects you with doctors via video chat, allowing you to ask questions, get advice, and receive prescriptions. Maven was founded by Kate Ryder, who came up with the idea for the app when she was working at a venture-capital fund in London. Ryder noticed that all of her friends were starting to get pregnant and were receiving a lot of misinformation or having trouble finding the right doctor.

Users can connect with doctors, nurse practitioners, and mental health experts through the app. 

Founded: 2014 by Kate Ryder

Funding: $6.67 million from Female Founders Fund, Grand Central Tech, BoxGroup, and others.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Microsoft and Qualcomm invested in an Israeli startup factory set up by 3 ex-IDF members

$
0
0

Nadav Team8

Microsoft and Qualcomm have made an investment in an Israeli startup facility set up by three former members of the Israeli Defence Force (IDF).

Team8, founded by Nadav Zafrir, Liran Grinberg, and Israel Grinberg, announced on Monday that it has received an undisclosed investment from the corporates that it will use to help it develop its portfolio of cybersecurity startups.

A Team8 spokesman refused to be drawn on the figure but it's likely to amount to tens of millions of dollars. 

The startup backer, which describes itself as cross between a venture capital firm, a think tank, and a startup incubator, has already raised $92 million (£75 million) for its "syndicate." Citigroup also joined the syndicate but it did not invest any money. Other organisations that have previously invested money in Team8 include Cisco, AT&T, Accenture, Nokia Temasek, Mitsui, Bessemer Venture Partners, Eric Schmidt's Innovation Endeavors, and Marker LLC.

"Our global cyber syndicate is one of the strongest in the world," claimed Zafrir, CEO of Team8 and former commander of Israel's illustrious technology & intelligence unit 8200, which is essentially the nation's cyber spy agency. "Adding the powerful brands of Microsoft Ventures, Qualcomm, and Citigroup will dramatically improve our research capabilities and access to the world’s biggest enterprises across a diverse arena of markets and industries."

Nagraj Kashyap, corporate VP at Microsoft Ventures, said in a statement: "Israel's tech ecosystem is well-known worldwide for its innovation and creativity, and its expertise in cybersecurity truly stands out. Microsoft will work closely with Team8 to explore and research some of the major challenges the world is facing with cybersecurity today."

During its first commercial year of operations in 2016, Team8 claims that its portfolio companies generated more than $22 million (£18 million) in sales. Since its launch two and a half years ago, the group has grown to 180 employees in Israel, US, UK, and Singapore and intends to hire 100 more in 2017.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Airplane designers have a brilliant idea for the middle seat

$5 billion Atlassian is paying $425 million for Trello, a beloved productivity app with 19 million users (TEAM)

$
0
0

atlassian cofounders bell ring

Atlassian, Australia's publicly traded $5 billion productivity software company, is buying the popular collaboration app Trello in a deal valued at $425 million — $360 million in cash, and $65 million in stock.

"Trello is this very elegant and incredibly popular visual communication medium," says Atlassian President Jay Simons.

Simons says that Atlassian doesn't want to mess with a good thing: Trello will stay entirely intact, with no plans to shut it down, rebrand it, or dramatically change its focus.

Instead, Simons says, "their customer base will cheer" as Atlassian funnels more engineering resources into improving the existing Trello product. And all existing Trello employees will stay onboard under the terms of the acquisition, Simons says. 

Trello, spun out of the 16-year-old Fog Creek Software in 2011, takes its inspiration from the "kanban"project management method, which traces its roots to Toyota industrial engineer Taiichi Ohno in the late 1940's. Basically, Trello lets you organize projects by moving virtual post-it notes on a virtual whiteboard.

And people really love it. Trello now claims to have over 19 million users, with over half of them working in business teams. That includes teams at companies like Google, Pixar, and Adobe. In its lifespan, Trello has raised a relatively modest $10.34 million in venture capital.

trello

For Atlassian, Trello is a natural fit, Simons says. The company's flagship JIRA product is all about project management, Trello is all about project organization, and so the two are extremely complementary. In fact, Simons says, a lot of Atlassian customers were already using the two products in conjunction.

Plus, Simons says, there's a cultural alignment. Trello CEO Michael Pryor has said that his big hope for the company was to eventually attract 100 million users, which is actually Atlassian's stated goal, too.

"We're chasing the same things," Simons says.

SEE ALSO: This startup took a famous Toyota management method and put it in an app

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The ‘Apple of China’ just showed off a TV that’s thinner than an iPhone — and it’s gorgeous


The VC firm set up by Skype's billionaire founder has backed a barcode scanning startup in a $7.5 million round

$
0
0

Niklas Zennström - founder of Atomico and Skype

Atomico, the venture capital company set up by Swedish billionaire Niklas Zennström, the cofounder of Skype, has backed a barcode scanning startup called Scandit in a $7.5 million (£6.2 million) funding round.

Founded in 2009 in Zurich by a team of PhD graduates and former researchers from ETH Zurich, MIT and IBM Research, Scandit has developed patented scanning technology that is designed to significantly decrease the amount of time it takes to scan a barcode.

Scandit doesn't have an app of its own. Instead, it offers an SDK (software development kit) that allows other companies to integrate the Scandit technology into their apps.

A video on Scandit's YouTube account shows a person using the Scandit iPhone app to quickly read and register barcodes, even when they're damaged. The app can detect barcodes from "any angle" and "long range," the company claims.

Scandit said it plans to use the investment to set up sales more offices across the US and Europe, and further develop its technology. The company currently serves the likes of The Co-operative Group, GE Healthcare, Home Depot, Macys, Shell, and Verizon.

Scandit CEO and co-founder Samuel Mueller said in a statement that "a handful of incumbents hold three-quarters of the market share" in the barcode scanning industry. He added: "Scandit offers power and flexibility that the existing players, despite their high price tags, simply cannot match."

Teddie Wardi, announced as Atomico's new partner on Tuesday alongside Carolina Brochado, said in a statement: "What Samuel and his team have achieved is testament to a winning combination of an exceptional product and team.

"They are exactly the kind of founders we look for, who have built a company that, through disruptive technology, is ready to expand and become a global category leader. We're excited to partner with Samuel and the team as they develop their stronghold."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Forget the iPhone 7 — here are 11 reasons the next iPhone will blow everyone away

Swedish payments startup iZettle has raised €60 million to fuel its growth

$
0
0

iZettle CEO Jacob De Geer

iZettle, a Swedish startup that allows individuals and small businesses to accept card payments via an app and a small card reader, has raised €60 million (£52 million, or $63 million) to fuel its growth.

The money, announced by iZettle on Wednesday, comes from existing investors as well as debt funding from US based, Victory Park Capital via its credit fund, VPC Speciality Lending PLC.

iZettle, which set up a small business loan service last year, said it will use the money to help it cover the costs of a recent acquisition and expand into new markets.

The funding round has not changed iZettle's valuation, which stands at $500 million (£411 million), TechCrunch reports.

iZettle said it has also appointed Maria Hedengren as its new chief financial officer (CFO). Hedengren previously served as CFO for publicly listed NetEnt AB (publ), a platform and games provider to casino and sports betting operators.

"Maria’s passion is gearing companies for growth and is exactly the type of person we need to get ready for the plans we have for 2017 and beyond," said Jacob de Geer, founder and CEO of iZettle, in a statement. "We are obviously impressed with the work that Maria has done for other fast moving tech companies, many of which live in heavily regulated environments like ours, and are more than excited by what she brings to the table."

iZettle is competing with Square in the US, which was founded by Twitter cofounder and CEO Jack Dorsey.

Gordon Watson, partner at Victory Park Capital, said in a statement: "We have been following the impressive growth of iZettle since its inception. iZettle is an innovator and a clear market leader in Europe and we want to be part of its next chapter of growth. 2017 promises to be a vibrant and buoyant time for both iZettle and its market."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The story of Lisa Brennan-Jobs, the daughter Steve Jobs claimed wasn't his

Appetite for Just Eat takeaways slowed down in the last quarter

$
0
0

David Buttress

Shares in food delivery service Just Eat fell on Tuesday as the London food startup published its annual results, which show that food orders slowed at the end of 2016.

Just Eat orders rose 38% in the first nine months of 2016 but they only increased 36% in the last quarter of the year.

Shares in the company, which is now competing with the likes of Uber Eats, Amazon, and Deliveroo, dropped almost 7% off the back of the results, the biggest drop in nearly seven months.

David Reynolds, an analyst at Jefferies, said in a note cited by Bloomberg that the latest company update was "likely to disappoint".

He added: "No real knocks to the thesis, just a reality check as the guidance upgrade conveyor belt comes to a stop."

David Buttress, CEO of Just Eat, said in a statement: "Just Eat's reported order growth puts us in a strong position to deliver full year results in line with our previous financial guidance. We enter 2017 with continuing confidence in the business."

The results come after a busy year of acquisitions for Just Eat.

In December, Just Eat announced that it had agreed to acquire British takeaway service Hungryhouse from German parent company Delivery Hero for a base purchase price of £200 million, with a further cash consideration of up to £40 million, based on performance.

The company also said it was acquiring Canadian online food delivery service SkipTheDishes for an initial consideration of £66.1 million ($110 million Canadian dollars).

In August, it bought the British assets of food delivery startup Takeaway.com for an undisclosed price.

And in February, Just Eat spent £94.7 million to acquire Spain's La Nevera Roja, Italy's PizzaBo/hellofood Italy, Brazil's hellofood Brazil, and Mexico's hellofoodMexico.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This teen makes up to $1,500 a night eating dinner in front of a webcam in South Korea

The UK CEO for taxi app Gett has left the company

$
0
0

Gett Western Europe MD Remo Gerber.

Remo Gerber, the UK CEO and managing director for Gett in Western European, has left the taxi company amid increasing competition from rival taxi apps.

The news was confirmed by a spokesperson for Gett.

Gerber has been replaced by former Goldman Sachs banker Matteo de Renzi, who was appointed as CEO of Gett in Western Europe in October.

Gerber joined Gett in February 2014 as UK CEO before becoming promoted to managing director for Western Europe in April 2015. His LinkedIn profile states that he still works at the company.

"After more than two years of fantastic service, Remo decided to return to his native Switzerland," said a Gett spokesperson. "Gett wish him all the very best with his new endeavours."

While at Gett, Gerber introduced a Gett courier service that allowed people to get items delivered across Central London in 20 minutes. Gerber told Business Insider that Gett Courier represented a "huge opportunity" for the company that could provide a major new revenue stream.

He said he was hoping that Gett's existing corporate customers would start using Gett to make deliveries as well as hail cabs."We're serving half of the Fortune 500, including law firms, consulting firms, and banks," said Gerber, formerly COO of deals and coupons website Groupon.

Gerber's departure comes less than half a year after the CEO of Gett's Russia business stepped down.

Founded in Israel in 2010, Gett employs over 1,000 people in Tel Aviv, the US, the UK, and Russia. All of the R&D, however, takes place in Israel. The company has raised $622 million (£514 million), according to Crunchbase.

Gerber's departure from the company comes as on demand taxi apps struggle to compete with Uber in the UK and many other countries. Last July, London taxi-app Hailo merged merged with MyTaxi, the ridesharing company Daimler bought two years ago. As a result of the deal, Hailo's app and services are due to be rebranded to MyTaxi by mid-2017.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Weed, crab legs, and a mermaid — inside the massive marijuana-mansion party thrown by Instagram's 'Marijuana Don'

The world's largest tech investment fund is almost ready for business, but it sounds different from what Trump was told (AAPL, QCOM)

$
0
0

Trump

Billionaire Masayoshi Son's company, SoftBank, is currently putting the finishing touches on a $100 billion investment fund called the SoftBank Vision Fund.

The fund is expected to be the world's largest technology investment fund and claims investors such as Apple, Foxconn, Oracle cofounder Larry Ellison, Qualcomm, and Saudi Arabia's investment arm.

The way the fund was publicized suggested that it intended to invest in startups and emerging technologies. In December, Son told President-elect Donald Trump that $50 billion of the fund would be invested in US startups, according to Bloomberg.

But it turns out the majority of the fund will go to "larger investments" in private and public markets, according to a report in The New York Times on Thursday.

Three-quarters of the $100 billion could be used to "grab a piece of an undervalued technology company trading on the stock exchange," or do a private-equity deal, according to the report. It will still make smaller venture capital investments in startups with the remaining money.

However, bankers involved with the fund told The Times, growth is the emphasis — so if the fund were to take a company private, it wouldn't intend to slash jobs, which happens in some private-equity deals.

The jobs aspect is key, because Son, who has met with Trump at Trump Tower, has said the fund would bring 50,000 jobs to the United States.

Trump has also claimed credit for the jobs created by the fund.

However, Apple, whose $1 billion investment in the Softbank Vision Fund is on the smaller side, has said that it invested because of the fund's possibility of developing new technologies, which typically come out of startups and not companies that have been taken private through private-equity deals.

"We've worked closely with SoftBank for many years and we believe their new fund will speed the development of technologies which may be strategically important to Apple," an Apple spokesperson told Business Insider.

It's also possible that Apple is looking for a strong return on its investment, although whatever the fund ends up making in 12 years — when it has to pay back its investors — will likely pale in comparison to the money Apple makes from sales of iPhones and other products.

The Softbank Vision Fund has a five-year deadline to invest its $100 billion. The fund will be led by London investor Rajeev Misra, and it already has a "startup feel," according to The Times.

Read The New York Times' report »

SEE ALSO: SoftBank hired a London investor to help manage its $100 billion tech fund

Join the conversation about this story »

Viewing all 5208 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images